Join the most popular community of British swingers now
Login
mwm69
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 68
Bisexual Female, 67
UK
Forum
hwoar:OK:eeek:............. was just thinking that now we can post any image on here from the web, at the same time any of our naughty pics can be posted anywhere on the web too. Just tried it with one of our pics!!!! Has that always been the case or am i being stoooopid. Mrs MWM here of course. Mr MWM is on a plane to Spain at the mo so cant ask him.
Will have to be vigilant with private pics now or delete pics all together.
What do you reckon guys:uhoh:
Blimey LL, wasn't expecting a essay! Well done though!
Just for clarification...We're not interested in who has paid or not but we are interested in [color="yellow"]premium members[/color] as the free members have limited access and are therefore by default useless.
I started the thread because of the new '[i]members that may interest you[/i]' and was intrigued by the number of times we see the same profiles time after time. That made me do a few searches and I found that there is a very high percentage of Free Members...so all I wanted to know was how many of each category there are that are premium members.
But as you say, even if we knew that figure it would probably have no value as so many members appear to have fallen off the cart "[i][color="white"]in the last fortnight[/color][/i]".
Maybe all we need is a filter that allows us to toggle (on/off) seeing Free Member profiles?
But then again Monkfish's bland response is like waving a red rag to a bull, so I think I want to know a bit more now.
If you search for single females and only filter with photos and premium membership (important for us at least) the result is under Admin's 1000 limit and returns 570. Add another filter level of looking for a couple with a bi-fem and that reduces to 317. Of those 317 only 40 appear to be 'active'. This figure I believe.
All in all I just don't believe the 321,985 number. Or should I say it doesn't ring true with how it feels. Like you I think a smaller committed community is actually better than a humongous group of impersonal strangers but as I said, we'll never really know cos Admin seem to think BIG numbers will attract more members....which I happen to think is quite the opposite of reality. IMHO of course!
:bounce:
[quote user=ceylon1]May I just ask a question without the fear of anyone jumping down my throat? 
Do the statistics really matter? If so, then WHY?
Mrs Cey :love:[/quote]
Couldn't really give a toss about statistics Cey. Just curious about the real numbers of couples, straight single fems, bi single fems, straight single guys, gay single guys and those inbetween (Debs 
)
:bounce:
Do the statistics really matter? If so, then WHY?
Mrs Cey :love:[/quote]
Couldn't really give a toss about statistics Cey. Just curious about the real numbers of couples, straight single fems, bi single fems, straight single guys, gay single guys and those inbetween (Debs )
:bounce: 
:doggy::rose::thrilled::smoke:
:karaoke:
I know I need to get out more but the new "[i]Members that may interest you[/i]" sparked an idea. Why is it that the same people keep appearing on it time after time?
So I thought I'd check the numbers. The site says we have a total of registered users of [color="yellow"]321,852[/color]. However....if you do a search for premium members (no other filtering) these are the results as at 10/09/09 (09:53):-
Couples - 30 profiles per page, 33 pages plus 10 on page 34 = [color="yellow"]1000 [/color]exactly.
Single Males - 33 pages plus 9 on last page = [color="yellow"]999[/color].
Single Females - also 33 pages plus 8 on page 34 = [color="yellow"]998[/color].
So the total registered [color="yellow"]premium membership is 2997[/color]. That's less than 1% of the total.
Makes you wonder huh?
:bounce:
